Thoughts on publishing and editorial design matters: Difference between revisions

From Hackers & Designers
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:




===Why do we like publishing?===
==Publishing?==




Line 12: Line 12:
[http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/sxsw/2011-03-15/sxswi-events-have-become-magazines-bruce-sterling-on-austin-sxswi-and-more/ "Events Have Become Magazines"]
[http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/sxsw/2011-03-15/sxswi-events-have-become-magazines-bruce-sterling-on-austin-sxswi-and-more/ "Events Have Become Magazines"]


====And further====  
====And further====
 


===Why do we like destruction?===
===Why do we like destruction?===

Revision as of 17:27, 7 February 2016

Premise

During the 5-day workshop we will examine the possibilities of self-destruction in relation to cross-media publishing.

Modes of production: Discussion, sketching & prototyping, paired with hands-on exercises (crash course: terminal, crash course: python & scrape yourself).


Publishing?

Events

"Events Have Become Magazines"

And further

Why do we like destruction?

H&D publishing attempts

Link to the etherpad

Etherpad: Collective note taking


Goals for this week

Make a publication or a prototype of a publication that has a build in expiration date (optimally the date of the end presentation, Friday February 12th). The publication in this context can live online or/and offline. It can be printed matter, e-pub, a performance, an object or an audio file, as long it’s informed by technology in some extend.

General notes