Anja Groten, James Bryan Graves, Selby Gildemacher,

In 2015 Hackers & Designers launched their first summer academy. Having gone trough the collective efforts of investigating the format of a summer academy, coordinating, curating and producting the 10-day long elaborate program, H&D decided to share their learning process with this printed documenation prepped as a collection of HOW TO-manuals, articles and other content produced during the H&D Summer Academy 2015. Further informatiom can be found on hackersanddesigners.nl and wiki.hackersanddesigners.nl

10 steps towards a Summer Academy

Formulate a clear motivation and goal.

Hackers and Designers was initiated by Selby Gildemacher (artist), James Bryan Graves (programmer) and Anja Groten (designer). As H&D we believe designers and artists, should be empowered with the tools of the digital realm including coding and hardware usage and construction. Conversely programmers and makers should be more comfortable and effective in engaging in creative process through familiarity with the vocabulary of designers and artists. All disciplines should become more comfortable in theoretical and social discourse, and thus be asking questions such as not only “can we” but “should we”. Having organized meet-ups for 2 years we have tested our approach extensively and could incorporate learnings in our considerations for planning a more elaborate program such as the H&D Summer Academy.

Find a title that coheres every initiators interests.

Finding a title can be a fast and easy or a painful and long process. In our case we had long discussions but evenutally sticked to the initial idea. Coming from different discipline and different cultures we decided for a "fun" title that triggers imagination no matter what skills or interests, rather than communicating something bold and provocative. It helps to visualize the title, make an example posters to explore its possibilites. Stirred by the title "About Bugs, Bots and Bytes" we eventually managed to curate an engaging and inclusive program.

Communicate.

Mouth to mouth: Go where your possible participant is. We for example joined a group of CWI students to an after seminar drink and pitched our Summer Academy. Be opportunistic and keep on talking about your plans. That way people will start asking questions and remember when they get a newsletter. Furthermore every time you tell your story it gets better. Write newsletter as straight forward as possible. Don't include every detail of your program no matter how much you would like to. We experienced that press releases are overrated and as far as we know didn't turn into any more visitors, participants or publicity. The same counts for online advertisement. We placed 2 advertisements and did not have the feeling that there was a big resonnance on them. However posters and flyers seemed to work better. We prepared packages with each 5 posters and 20 flyers and send them to academies and universities abroad and received most application from people who have seen a poster or a flyer. Furthermore we used a professional poster disctribution firm to spread promotion posters in Amsterdam, which saved us a lot time. Regarding social media we experience meet-up.com much more reliable when it comes to RSVP's than Facebook. By mentioning workshop tutors or participants on Twitter you extend the reach and the possibility for tweets to be picked up becomes bigger. From reddit we learned that bad publicity is better than no publicity. Apparently people felt offended about some terms which were used in a word rotator on our website. The words Bugs, Bots and Bytes were rotating to different words when users hoovered over them. Two of the words in the word rotator were Boobs and Booze, which reddit readers found sexist and a trivilization of alcohol abuse. After a long debate between the organizers we replaced the words Booze and Boobs for the words Baboons and Bio-butter

Being inclusive.

Providing a rich and critical program and at the same time being inclusive can be challenging but isn't impossible. For H&D it was important to fostering an understanding of contemporary digital culture and maximising participation, ambiguities and misconceptions about topics like privacy, surveillance, open source, user-controlled platforms, role of algorithms, digital-self and identity. Researching these topics in a playful and hands-on manner helped bypassing the risk to expose particpants to definite ideas and ideals.

Selecting particpants.

It can be helpful to make a profile of the "perfect" particpant in order to formulate a straight forward communication strategy and develop the right visual means. However you should stay open for alternative profiles during the selection process. We started targeting mainly students and eventually half of the participants were working professionals. Sometimes it is a bit scary if you don't hear back from people and you will ask yourself "Will people actually show up?". Don't be afraid to call the particpants to ask if anyone has questions. That way you are more confident and the particpants appreciate your care. Furthermore don't try to convince people to particpate. It is worthwhile asking for feedback: Did you understand our Newsletter? Did it give you a clear impression of what is going to happen at the Summer Academy? and so forth. But if you would like independantly thinking people who are initiators, they should apply based on their own motivation and drive.

Line-up.

Make sure you have one or two 'headliners' in your line-up. Headliners are people/initiatives that are well-known and help forming an image in peoples heads of what the program will look like. Furthermore try to not shop within your own crowd to much. Use this chance to contact new people who have been recommend or that you bump into on the internet. That way you leave space for new cohestion and interesting, unique program without to many usual suspects.

Approach.

(See also: How to research stuff by making.)

For creating a program it is worthwhile to sincerely consider the approach you want to take on. This approach should fit to your initative and the way your initiative is functioning. Eventually the approach will result into the sphere during the program. The sphere we wanted to create for the H&D Summer Academy has been: hands-on, cross-disciplinary and non-hierachical.

By investigating through creating, new considerations were triggered. The workshop format allowed thoughts to be immediately materialized, which lead to different discussions and eventually brought the disciplines closer together and introduced the idea of a cross-disciplinary vocabulary.

The horizonal, non-hierachical atmosphere lead to a friendly togetherness and self-driven and productive work climate.

Finding a suitable location.

Upon arrive the participants and tutors should feel as comfortable as possible. The choice location is therefore a crucial decision. The biggest part of the Summer Academy took place in De PUNT, an art & project space in the center of Amsterdam. H&D as an initiave as it's roots and has established a local infrastructure that made organization and coordination feasable. One should consider practical aspects, such as: Where and how to do groceries as well as traveltime for contributors and participants. Organizing a program in another, not explored context demands much more investigation and research and therefore has a big influence on workload and budget.

$$$$$$$

Many funds like to see that your enterprise generates income. Consider well if you would like to charge for your program and make sure the fee is appropriate to the audience you are inviting. Obviously the higher the price you are asking the higher the expectation. The cover charge of the H&D Summer Academy was €350,00 per participant and covered the 10 day program, a welcome dinner, daily lunches and an arduino kit.

Plan A, B, C.

If you are planning to apply for funding, be aware that it can take up to 4-6 months to hear back. You might not receive fundings at all. Always incorporate the worst case scenario in your planning and don't rely to much on one source. This is challenging in terms of planning, communication and finding contributors who are flexible enough. We have experienced a refusal from a fund and requested a revision. Eventually we received some of the funds. The process was very time-consuming and challenged us in terms of changing the plans accordingly. However we decided from the beginning that our priority is to guarantee a high qualitiy workshop program without compromise, which could have been always covered by the participation fee. Having received fundings afterall we could spend some money on catering and materials, promotional material and so forth.