Counter Interfaces: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
So we proposed to look the those tools we are most familiar with. As a graphic designer and image maker this might be for instance Photoshop. What are Photoshops strategies of mediations? How does the Photoshop interface translated binary computational processes? What are the considerations of the interface's visual communication between us (the user and producer) and the machine? | So we proposed to look the those tools we are most familiar with. As a graphic designer and image maker this might be for instance Photoshop. What are Photoshops strategies of mediations? How does the Photoshop interface translated binary computational processes? What are the considerations of the interface's visual communication between us (the user and producer) and the machine? | ||
[[File:toolbars.jpeg| Tool bar timeline]] | [[File:toolbars.jpeg| Tool bar timeline]] | ||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
The workshop departed from an investigation of Graphic User Interfaces (GUI). Looking at the Photoshop toolbar one could for instance question their actual 'toolness' – their utilitarian transparency and translate its functionalities into an interaction with a material controller – something physical that could represent or challenge the way we interact with it in Photoshop. By translating seamless processes of interfacing into slow or clunky physical controlling one enters a mode of defamilarization breaking at habits that are embedded in our making practices | The workshop departed from an investigation of Graphic User Interfaces (GUI). Looking at the Photoshop toolbar one could for instance question their actual 'toolness' – their utilitarian transparency and translate its functionalities into an interaction with a material controller – something physical that could represent or challenge the way we interact with it in Photoshop. By translating seamless processes of interfacing into slow or clunky physical controlling one enters a mode of defamilarization breaking at habits that are embedded in our making practices | ||
Picture: Timeline of the Photoshop toolbar.* | ''Picture: Timeline of the Photoshop toolbar.*'' | ||
Adobe Photoshop is a raster graphics editor developed and published by Adobe Systems for macOS and Windows. | Adobe Photoshop is a raster graphics editor developed and published by Adobe Systems for macOS and Windows. | ||
Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
The UI of a punch card (IBM), which gave input to Batch computers, was so minimal because of the valuable computer power | The UI of a punch card (IBM), which gave input to Batch computers, was so minimal because of the valuable computer power | ||
UI was so minimal because it used valuable computer power | UI was so minimal because it used valuable computer power | ||
[[File:commandline.jpeg | Command Line]] | [[File:commandline.jpeg | Command Line]] | ||
Line 52: | Line 50: | ||
Image: 1975. Digital's first upper/lower case video terminal. It's previous video terminals, the VT05 and VT50, were upper-case only. | Image: 1975. Digital's first upper/lower case video terminal. It's previous video terminals, the VT05 and VT50, were upper-case only. | ||
In 1978, DEC announced the VT78, which was a word processor made by putting a PDP-8 computer chip and some memory inside a VT52 and adding an external RX02 dual 8-inch floppy disk drive. This was the predecessor to the DECmate. | In 1978, DEC announced the VT78, which was a word processor made by putting a PDP-8 computer chip and some memory inside a VT52 and adding an external RX02 dual 8-inch floppy disk drive. This was the predecessor to the DECmate. | ||
[[File:tvideoterminal.jpeg| Video terminal]] | [[File:tvideoterminal.jpeg| Video terminal]] | ||
Line 61: | Line 58: | ||
Leading researcher Alan Kay involved children in the development process
. Kay understood computers as simulation machine of old media (imitating)
. The Intention behind GUI was to create an unified user interface that activated different mentalities and ways of learning–kinesthetic (physical, tactile), iconic, symbolic
⁃unravelling. Important was an '''instant''' interaction between user and computer. Kay was interested in computers as medium of expression through drawing, animating, writing, composing. Kay furthermore looked at computers as tools to create tools. | Leading researcher Alan Kay involved children in the development process
. Kay understood computers as simulation machine of old media (imitating)
. The Intention behind GUI was to create an unified user interface that activated different mentalities and ways of learning–kinesthetic (physical, tactile), iconic, symbolic
⁃unravelling. Important was an '''instant''' interaction between user and computer. Kay was interested in computers as medium of expression through drawing, animating, writing, composing. Kay furthermore looked at computers as tools to create tools. | ||
"The ability to 'read' a medium means you can access materially and tools generated by others. The ability to 'write' in a medium means you can generate materials and tools for others. You must have both to be literate"** | "The ability to 'read' a medium means you can access materially and tools generated by others. The ability to 'write' in a medium means you can generate materials and tools for others. You must have both to be literate"** | ||
[[File:mobiledevices.jpeg | Mobile devices]] | [[File:mobiledevices.jpeg | Mobile devices]] | ||
Line 69: | Line 65: | ||
Interfaces are shrinking or disappearing fully (Voice control, ubiquitous computing) | Interfaces are shrinking or disappearing fully (Voice control, ubiquitous computing) | ||
* From: Manovich L., ''Software Takes Command'' (2013) | * From: Manovich L., ''Software Takes Command'' (2013) | ||
** ibid | ** ibid | ||
Line 78: | Line 73: | ||
In his book Software Takes Command (2013) Manovich speaks about the software society, framing computers as cultural machines and contemporary techniques of control. | In his book Software Takes Command (2013) Manovich speaks about the software society, framing computers as cultural machines and contemporary techniques of control. | ||
==Introduction into Key board mapping with Arduino Leonardo== | |||
==Documentation== | |||
<eplite src="https://etherpad.hackersanddesigners.nl/p/" id="counterinterfaces" height="1000px" width="1000px" /> | <eplite src="https://etherpad.hackersanddesigners.nl/p/" id="counterinterfaces" height="1000px" width="1000px" /> |
Revision as of 09:51, 30 November 2018
About the Workshop
Intuitively we scroll, swipe, use our voice and gestures to control our devices, – to activate, trigger, cause, provoke the computer to deploy, react, return and activate. The question we will investigate through making is: Who is exactly controlling who and how?
During this hands-on workshop we investigated ways to take apart and reassemble remote controllers and other battery powered toys in unintended ways. By saving redundant electronics from becoming e-waste we hacked our way into the mechanics of human computer interaction and user interfaces. At the same time we learned about electronics all the while critically reflecting on the notion of control.
Milestones in interface history
The starting point of the workshop was the claim that in order to understand media today we need to understand media software – its genealogy (where it comes from), its anatomy (interfaces and operations), and its practical and theoretical effects.
So we proposed to look the those tools we are most familiar with. As a graphic designer and image maker this might be for instance Photoshop. What are Photoshops strategies of mediations? How does the Photoshop interface translated binary computational processes? What are the considerations of the interface's visual communication between us (the user and producer) and the machine?
The workshop departed from an investigation of Graphic User Interfaces (GUI). Looking at the Photoshop toolbar one could for instance question their actual 'toolness' – their utilitarian transparency and translate its functionalities into an interaction with a material controller – something physical that could represent or challenge the way we interact with it in Photoshop. By translating seamless processes of interfacing into slow or clunky physical controlling one enters a mode of defamilarization breaking at habits that are embedded in our making practices
Picture: Timeline of the Photoshop toolbar.*
Adobe Photoshop is a raster graphics editor developed and published by Adobe Systems for macOS and Windows. Photoshop was developed in 1987 by the American brothers Thomas and John Knoll, who sold the distribution license to Adobe Systems Incorporated in 1988.
Photoshop 1.0 was released on 19 February 1990 for Macintosh exclusively. Since then, it has become the de facto industry standard in raster graphics editing, such that the word "photoshop" has become a verb as in "to Photoshop an image," "photoshopping" and "photoshop contest".
It can edit and compose raster images in multiple layers and supports masks, alpha compositing and several color models including RGB, CMYK, CIELAB, spot color and duotone.
Photoshop's feature set can be expanded by Photoshop plug-ins, programs developed and distributed independently of Photoshop that can run inside it and offer new or enhanced feature
In June 2013, with the introduction of Creative Cloud branding, Photoshop's licensing scheme was changed to that of software as a service rental model and the "CS" suffixes were replaced with "CC"
Batch computing comes from a time when computer power didn’t exceed that of modern microwaves.
A Punch card is the earliest machine-readable medium for reading data.
The UI of a punch card (IBM), which gave input to Batch computers, was so minimal because of the valuable computer power UI was so minimal because it used valuable computer power
The introduction of CLO (Command line interfaces) reduced latency (waiting time). The user interface allowed for a series of request-response transactions.
The video display terminals facilitated command line input, which would appear on a screen. Importantly the input could be reversely modified, which reduced need for ink and printing materials.
Image: 1975. Digital's first upper/lower case video terminal. It's previous video terminals, the VT05 and VT50, were upper-case only. In 1978, DEC announced the VT78, which was a word processor made by putting a PDP-8 computer chip and some memory inside a VT52 and adding an external RX02 dual 8-inch floppy disk drive. This was the predecessor to the DECmate.
The GUI as we know it today – as pointing systems – was developed by researchers at Xerox Palo Research Center (PARC) in 1979. The first release fully integrated desktop computer was Xerox star in 1981, followed by VisiCorp Viso On (1984), and Mac OS System (1984).
Leading researcher Alan Kay involved children in the development process . Kay understood computers as simulation machine of old media (imitating) . The Intention behind GUI was to create an unified user interface that activated different mentalities and ways of learning–kinesthetic (physical, tactile), iconic, symbolic ⁃unravelling. Important was an instant interaction between user and computer. Kay was interested in computers as medium of expression through drawing, animating, writing, composing. Kay furthermore looked at computers as tools to create tools. "The ability to 'read' a medium means you can access materially and tools generated by others. The ability to 'write' in a medium means you can generate materials and tools for others. You must have both to be literate"**
At the end of 2000 GUI’s changed significantly: With the increasing popularity of smartphones interfaces had to be rethought from scratch. In todays devices not much form the initial though around GUI is left. Interfaces are shrinking or disappearing fully (Voice control, ubiquitous computing)
- From: Manovich L., Software Takes Command (2013)
- ibid
Lev Manovich is a Russian born, US based media theorist. His research focuses on digital humanities, social computing, new media art and software studies. Manovich claims software is often overlooked by humanities.
In his book Software Takes Command (2013) Manovich speaks about the software society, framing computers as cultural machines and contemporary techniques of control.
Introduction into Key board mapping with Arduino Leonardo
Documentation
<eplite src="https://etherpad.hackersanddesigners.nl/p/" id="counterinterfaces" height="1000px" width="1000px" />
If the pad does not show up visit here: etherpad.hackersanddesigners.nl/p/counterinterfaces